Shunting - why Monogamy is Kryptonite to Super-Woman

I would like to coin a Term

Shunting. verb. moving from one socioeconomic strata to another by means of a sexual relationship.

When I floated this term past Facebook I was told ‘shunting’ is known in socioeconomics as ‘trading up’, a term I would like to usurp. ‘trading up’ implies volition - we imagine a conniving woman making a conscious choice to replace a lower-class mate with a higher-class mate for a better house/car/job/clothes - which happens often enough - ‘shunting’ is an involuntary process with what I believe are biological rather than purely socioeconomic underpinnings, and it can happen in any direction, up down sideways on the socioeconomic ladder, though it is most useful to talk about shunting in its ascendant aspect. When a lower-class man dumps a lower-class woman to replace her with a higher-class woman who has wooed him, he is shunting while she is being dumped. Shunting appears starkly in the lives of women moreso than men however as women are the submissive sex in General and so the example of shunting we are most accustomed to hearing about is a lower-class woman being conquered or captured or won by a higher-class man because she is especially good-looking or kind or resourceful and he has plied her with gifts and affection and noble deeds and offers of marriage ( young women are taught to desire this arrangement and hope and plan for it at the expense of other activities ), rather than a male youth of lower-class but exceptional whatever who dumps his preexisting similar-class girlfriend for a wealthier woman, though we do hear often enough of high-born men who ditch high-born women for loose women; he is shunting down usually to great scandal and career disaster or a deft cover-up which sometimes includes murder of the mistress. A high-born woman marries a high-born man and he is not going to leave her for his lower-class mistresses unless he finds a particularly talented prostitute or one of his wife’s friends or one of his graduate students or secretaries or he is secretly in love with his female business rival, though I suppose cases of high-born women plucking lower-class boys from their jobs and girlfriends to serve as husbands has happened on occasion - we call that ‘cradle-robbing’ and it happens wherever women become cultivated and wealthy. being much younger counts as being in a ‘lower-class’, I think, even if lovers are from the same socioeconomic strata, unless the youth is the older person’s boss, as in the case of Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg, who are so headed for it let’s watch out Berg & Berg in 2015-6. Certainly in 2014 cradle-robbing doesn’t happen nearly as often as sugar-daddy/baby relationships, when a younger woman of lower-class is swept off her feet and away from men of her class or age-range by a man of higher-class who offers her gifts he can afford in his position the other men cannot afford, and messages abound in media culture telling women to want this to happen and plan for this process of self-improvement by a man of means. So it makes sense to speak of ‘shunting’ particularly in light of sugar daddy/baby relationships where a woman of a certain class is elevated beyond her immediate means by a sexual relationship with a man of a higher-class, a relationship that usually disrupts &/ terminates her sexual relationships to men of her former class ( once you go black you don’t go back; once you go rich you’ll ditch ) and I want to stress that very often this process of mate-selection is involuntary, unconscious, and unavoidable, rather than necessarily the conscious scheming of a social-climber who could not otherwise than through duplicitous sexual favours scale the socioeconomic ladder. since when do we ‘choose’ who we fall in love with?

Ascendant lower-class to higher-class / younger woman to older man shunting has been happening to me my whole sexual life and I wish to illuminate its rape aspects and ties to the sex industry. Why, for example, do certain women become prostitutes? when prostitution is regarded as a lowly profession and great shame? Is it because women who have sex with many men for worldly favours are ‘fallen’ ‘sinners’? Is it because these women are ‘victims’ of ‘human trafficking’? or is it because of ‘shunting’? If we examine the phenomenon of prostitution from the perspective that it is a ‘shunting’ process - a process of scaling socioeconomic strata by means of taking lovers - the relationship between demand and supply exists in prostitution is exposed and clarified: there exists a demand for sex-workers despite the stigma attached to this profession and so many women become prostitutes despite the stigma against them. ie: individual women are shunted into prostitution because the demand exists for prostitutes from socioeconomically-dominant men. This shunting process is happening on a community level - as in the case of me from an isolated Canadian town without high-end prostitutes growing up to be a high-end prostitute for my rich bf’s dad who wanted a convenient high-end prostitute, which will be discussed further - and on the international level - like lower-class women from Eastern Bloc European countries trafficked en masse to richer countries where they serve as prostitutes and wives for richer men than are available in their country of birth, and their homegrown men profit too - if they are willing to play the pimps of their own women! In that case, the whole poorer country is being ‘shunted’ by richer countries. When a dominant male wishes for a female lover he can pay money or other goods and services for the right to use her body sexually on a casual basis ( what separates prostitution from marriage is the ‘casual’ nature of the sexual relationship, not there being goods and services traded for sexual favours, which common to both marriage and prostitution ) a submissive woman who can accommodate the dominant man is ‘shunted’ into the position he desires to see her in. Little girl nxt door grows up to be a wise-cracking goth hooker who likes you personally. This is what happened between me and neighbor boy’s upper-middle-class dad in the small isolated Northern Canadian town. When a dominating male in a sparsely populated neighborhood in a remote town that lacked high-end prostitutes for the rich dad to frequent wished there were a high-end prostitute around the corner for him to frequent the girl who lived down the street who had regular sex with his teenage son grew up to be a high-end prostitute who still lives a neighboring town. Hahahahahahah how did that happen? did I ‘choose’ to become a prostitute or was I ‘shunted’ into the position by observable demand=supply socioeconomics? Does being shunted in this case and most imply rape? even if only psychological and behavioral? 
Invisible Hand of the Market Demand=Supply Economics asks 
"Statistics indicate there aren't enough Whores in this Town to meet Popular Demand. Which little Girl wants to be an Orgy-Party Hooker-Mistress instead of University?" 
Me. Rich NeighborBoy I like Better than Skool quit sword-fighting with me to take Drugs and go to Sx Parties.
"Oh Good - for Every Dozen Prostitutes needed to fill the projected Demand in this Town we'll have to hire at Least One Pimp and he'll need to know how to use Weapons to defend his Hookers against a Variety of Threats inherent to the inDustry. Say Party-Boy - do you like Whores? What Boy doesn't. Have I got an Economically-Viable Job for you. As your Government, I mean Father, I mean Government, I suggest you go to University and get a Degree in Sociology so you know who to aim your Hookers at and the People buying your Hookers, I mean me, I mean the Government, can feel assured they're buying from a Reputable Brothel with Refined Management."
Number-crunching. I can do it even though I left Skool to become a Street Hooker for Smart PEpl.

When we imagine a girl becoming a prostitute we imagine a girl who ‘has no choice’ who is forced into the position by socioeconomic necessity, even if she calls the profession ‘empowering’ she is only blurring the lines between what sorts of jobs we are willing to call slavery or human trafficking. If casual sex for goods and services is ‘empowering’ working as a waitress for $8/Hour+Tips is a form of slavery and human trafficking. which might explain why politicians are desperate to eradicate sex-for-money but not waitressing-for-money. 

If we imagine all girls who become prostitutes are forced into it by socioeconomic necessity when they would rather do something else like waitress or get married, are we implying girls who become prostitutes are ‘raped into’ sex-for-goods/services? To be polite and academic, I would call being ‘raped into’ prostitution being ‘shunted into’ prostitution. ‘shunted into’ evokes a violent push followed by many strange people having sex with you repeatedly from behind, which sounds like rape to me, who would say life as barely-legal prostitute supply for my rich dad’s kinky-sex demand feels like that, yes, though that’s not to say all prostitutes are rape victims, just there’s something decidedly rapey about having to become a prostitute out of socioeconomic necessity. Gosh. can you imagine what would have happened to me if I hadn’t left Smithers before my rich neighbor found me bumming around the bars waiting for someone who looked surprisingly like him to buy me a drink and an apartment to write journals about his double-life in? But the rapist got himself transferred to a new better job closer to me and other considerably-younger high-end mistress-prostitutes who take drugs and aren't put off by sadomasochism. Things work out well for him and me too ultimately little girl who lives inside of me.

I’ll tell you what I did ‘choose’ to be, if you care to hear it now after the scary rape story that grossed you out: CEO of a highly-successful new-media company branded like Apple, Google, Facebook and VICE - LLWAM. So, how does a woman who wants to be CEO of a media company who instead by socioeconmic necessity was shunted into prostitution for rich old men become CEO of a major media company? are these two professions - prostitute and Media CEO - mutually-exclusive? as in - long as I’m a prostitute I can’t be a Media CEO // long as I’m a Media CEO I can’t be a prostitute? I should hope not mutually-exclusive and I think not because I’m stuck in the one role due to socioeconomic demand=supply=shunting=rape=brainwashing=fixed-mistress/prostitute-sexual-persona-regardless-of-profession whereas if current numbers are anything to go on the demand for a Female Media CEO supply is not nearly as high as the demand for a Female Prostitute-to-Media-CEOs supply. Therefore, if I want to be the rare Female Media CEO but have been shunted into being a prostitute because they in higher demand in small-town Canada and elsewhere, I can go about becoming a rare Female Media CEO by acting as a prostitute for Male CEOs of whom there are a great number in the market for a female prostitute to make them feel Good about themselves for being Male CEOs, all I have to do is charge viewing me as a CEO for having sex with me if you are a CEO, which is a great deal, I think - who can beat it? If you are a woman who wants to be a New-Media CEO you may have noticed what I noticed: there are no Highly-Successful or Plutocratic Female CEOs who are not University-Educated ‘Corporate Leader’s hired by Large Companies with Xtended Histories. ie: there are no Female Founders of Major Media or Tech Companies, though there are a Few Joiners and Some inHeritors. Why is this - the Complete&Utter Lack of Female Company-Founders at the Plutocratic Social-Strata which is abundant in Men of the Same Professional Description? And what does this Glaring Deficit of Plutocratic Female Founders have to do with Demand=Supply Socioeconomics and the Comparative Abundance of High-eNd Female eScorts who will have Sx with you if you are a Male CEO with a Lot More MOney than the REst of us?

Where are the Women?

- p.87

My own suspicion is that most plutocrats privately believe women don’t make it to the top because something is missing. Most know better than to muse on this matter in public-they all remember, for instance, what that cost Larry Summers, who happens to have a sterling record for promoting the careers of female proteges-but I can report an unguarded remark one private equity billionaire made to me. The problem, he said, wasn’t that women weren’t as smart or even as numerate as men; he had hired many women in starting positions who were as skilled as their male counterparts. But they still didn’t have the royal jelly: “They don’t have the killer instinct, they don’t want to fight, they won’t go for the jugular.” By way of evidence, he described a subordinate who had cried when he told her she had made a mistake. You can’t do that and win, he said.

Lawrence Henry "Larry" Summers (born November 30, 1954) is an American economist who is President Emeritus and Charles W. Eliot University Professor of Harvard University

a 2005 speech in which he suggested that the under-representation of women in science and engineering could be due to a "different availability of aptitude at the high end"

Hey Larry this LifeSkook HardkNOcks Eternal Student wants to be a CEO but got to be a High-eNd Prostitute instead offer a Harvard Special for me Clientz - Anyone who went to Harvard gets tortured in a Chamber cause that Place sounds like a Torture Chamber to me, the FrEspellzHpiuwan2fck

Women lack Killer-iNstinct for Business Jugular-Fighting with Aptitude the the High-eNd, eh? guess I’ll fill the Erotik Philosophical Essays my Media Company produces with Stories about slitting Throats of Rich Old Men who say Shit like that. 


being a Female-CEO Killer-of-Men makes up for being shunted into prostitution. But more on shunting and why it happened to me!, Dad, XOJane, everyOne - with our Snobby Neighbor with the Big House that was always far too-Clean.

Why does One Girl get raped by her Boyfriend's Dad and not anOther? Let's be Surprised and Thankful how Rarely Girls are raped by their BF's Dad.

Each inDividual Human has what I’m going to call a ‘Level’ of ‘Sx-eNergy’ that is divorced from their Socioeconomic Strata of Birth but, in my Observation, determines their Socioeconomic Strata for Life. As in: a Man can be born to a Lowly Position but by Virtue of Tremendous Will ( Masculine Sx-eNergy ) elevate himSelf Socioeconomically. Or a Man can be born to a Lowly Position but by Virtue of Tremendous Seductiveness ( Feminine Sx-eNergy ) elevate himSelf Socioeconomically. And the Same holds True for Women though Women are More Often Seductive than Willful and Men More Often Willful than Seductive. Or a Person can be High-born but through Sloth or Comeliness be reduced in Socioeconomic Position. The Level of Sx-eNergy a Person is born with can only be called a ‘Choice’ if you believe People determine their Fates as Bodiless Souls before they are born, which is not something I intend to debate here, so let’s say People do not ‘chose’ their Sx-eNergetic Levels - Sx-eNergetic Levels are Biological - but the Course of Life is eNtirely determined by these Biological Sx-eNergetic Levels. Like in my Case, unUsually-eLevated Sx-eNergy ( I am Both Highly Seductive and Particularly Wilful - a Female Prodigy ) make me More Attractive to mate with in the Eyes of my Boyfriend’s Dad than my Boyfriend - despite my Personal Preference for the Younger One he now finds me Somewhat Repulsive. A Woman born with unUsually-eLevated Sx-eNergy will almost inEvitably find herself in Sugar-Daddy/Baby Relationships with Older Richer Men who match her Seductive, Youthful ( Professionally-unSkilled ) Sx-eNergetic Levels with ( Professionally-Skilled ) Masculine Will Power. This Socioeconomic Shunting Process of Particularly Beautiful Women lacking Financially-Profitable Professional Skills to Rich Older Men looking for Casual Mistresses xplains the Phenomenon of Beautiful Young Women acting as Prostitutes before finding Socially-eLevated Husbands or finishing College: when a Woman is Particularly Beautiful and has a High Sx-Drive the Demand for her Body Sxually is Great, Much Greater than the Demand for her Skills as an Artist, for Xample, so Great she will do Better for herSelf Socioeconomically if she supplies herSelf Sxually in return for Goods and Services than if she ‘works’ Some Other ‘Paid’ ‘Job’ - like Waitressing, Modelling, or Writing Essays. If None of the Men she is having Sx with for Goods and Services can meet her Feminine Seductive Sx-eNergetic Levels inDividually with their Skilled Masculine Will Power this Woman will carry on compensating with Multiple Lovers until Such a Man as can meet her inDividually appears - if he ever appears. Many Women, like Many Men, and I am among these People, cannot be Sxually-satisfied by a Single Partner and require Multiple Rotating Lovers to remain Sane - Such People are Well-Suited to Prostitution as a Profession and are Most Likely to consent to it and feel eMpowered by it as a Profession in the Long Run than People who feel they would prefer to be Monogamously-Married but have to prostitute themSelves to survive without Alternative Marketable Skills or a Providing Partner.

Xamples of how Shunting works in the Sx Lives of Women

A Pretty Girl starts out Lightly Promiscuous as a Teenager with imMature Boys and Young Men in a Rich Country or the Upper-Classes of a Poor Country. As a Young Woman she realizes she can make More Easier Money selling Sx to Rich Older Men than working as a Waitress and Part-Time Model and decides to become a High-eNd Prostitute. She mistresses for Several Years before One of the Men she is seeing asks her to marry him or she meets a Man Closer to her Age who is Mature and Successful and they get married and she becomes a Housewife or gets a Part-Time Job or she carries on being a Sx Worker for the Rest of her Life because it is a Job she enjoys that meets her Needs for inTimacy. This Woman has undergone a Shunting Process, through Sx Work, into the Socioeconomic Strata Best-suits her Sx eNergetic Levels, though it is Likely she was raped at Least Once and calls it a Hazard of the Trade.

A Pretty Girl is born into a Poor Family in a Poor Country or the Lower-Classes of a Rich Country. As a Teenager she sells Sx to Rich Older Foreign Men under the ‘Protection’ of a Pimp who gets her hooked on Drugs to keep her submissive. As a Young Adult she attempts to escape her Pimp and is shot by One of his Henchmen. This Woman has undergone a Shunting Process, through Sx Work, into the Socioeconomic Strata that Best-suits her Sx eNergetic Levels, though it is Likely she was raped Many Many Times.

A Pretty Girl is born into a Poor Family in a Country either Rich or Poor. In Highschool she Chastely dates a Young Man from down the Street and they talk of Marriage. Only One Day, as a Nineteen Year-Old, the Pretty Girl attracts the Attention of a Rich Older Man who takes Photos in his Spare Time and is looking for a Wife. He approaches the 19 YO and invites her on a date to the Loveliest Restaurant in Town. The Girl, who has Never been to Such a Restaurant, accepts the offer. Over the Nxt Few Months the Rich Man courts the Girl and her Family who agree to his offer of Marriage, leading to strife with the Family of the Young Man who was dumped, but whatever. The Girl marries the Rich Older Man who rapes and Psychologically- and Verbally-abuses her Continually in their Marriage until she Finally gets up the Gumption to divorce him, at the Age of 35, with 2 Kids. She spends a Few Years working as a Waitress and Part-Time Model, and, at the Restaurant where she works ( a Decent Restaurant, but not the Best ) meets a Kind Middle-Class Man whom she marries and they have a Happy Life together with her Children from the Previous Marriage. This Woman has undergone a Shunting Process, through Sx Work, into the Socioeconomic Strata that Best-suits her Sx eNergetic Levels, though she was raped Many Many Times.

A Pretty Girl is born Middle-Class in a Country either Rich or Poor. In Prep-School she dates a Few Boys. In College she meets a Man in her Law Classes and they are married and Well-off. In Middle-Age, the Husband takes up with Prostitutes; the Wife knows but allows it, because it means he is not bothering her who is involved with her Job she likes and their Children she loves. The Husband continues seeing a Mistress until he is Advanced in Age, but the Wife Never doubts she is his True Love, as the Mistresses see the Man Only Occasionally, for Sx, and she sees him for everyThing else. This Woman has undergone a Shunting Process, through Sx Work, into the Socioeconomic Strata that Best-suits her Sx-eNergetic Levels, and she was Never raped.

A Pretty Girl is born into a Middle-Class Home in a Small Town in a Rich Country. In Highschool she is in Love with the Rich-Kid Fat-Boy, but he does not love her back, or doesn’t seem to, even though they are the Only Two Goths in Town - what is he? afraid she’ll fail to impress his Notoriously Stuck-up Father? - so she tries being with a Number of his Friends, All of whom leave her Cold, and none of whom can stop her from Xperimenting with Other Men or Girls or having Sx with the Upper-Middle-Class Boy she is still in Love with whenever he is in the Mood because he has taken enough Drugs to pretend the Drugs made him do it. Xhaused with Promiscuity, the Girl decides she would like to be married. She has no Trouble finding a Boy who says he will marry her, but this Boy cannot tolerate how Many Other Men want to be with his GF and they break up. The Woman-now dates another Man and the Same Thing happens again: she wants to be married but a Year into the Relationship, separated from her BF for the First Time, she cannot withstand the offers for Sx coming at her and she and her BF break up. The Same Thing happens again. And again. The Woman wants Badly to find a Man she can be with for Longer than a Year. As Soon as she breaks up with One Man another Man appears but that Man doesn’t last nor does the Nxt or the Nxt or the Nxt. These Men keep getting Older and Older. The Woman decides to call herSelf ‘Polyamorous’ and Only date Men who understand that she is ‘Polyamorous’. She meets an Older Lover who also identifies as ‘Polyamorous’ and the Two of them start a Media Company and have a Baby. As the Costs to their Family increase the Necessity of getting the Company off the Ground increases. The Woman is CEO of the Media Company, her Queer Male Partner is co-Founder and Director. Yet the Woman is afraid that if she approaches Successful Companies for Investment Funds, the Men who run these Companies ( the Vast Majority of Venture Capitalist are Men ) will not give her Money for her Start-up unless she gives them Sx for their Success. Otherwise, she could step down from the CEO Position at her Company, offer that Position to a Man she is married to who will act as a Buffer between her and Male Investors who might try to have Sx with her for being a Talented Woman at their All-Male 1%-Business-Success-Club. Rather than let a Husband run her Business so she won’t have to face Sxual Advances from Successful Peers, the Ambitious Woman who has been Compulsively Promiscuous her Whole Sx-Life decides to call herSelf a Prostitute who specializes in CEOs and Other Dictators. Suddenly, upon realizing her Position within the Plutocracy, her Strange Pattern of being unAble to hold on to Relationships with Men she'd met in the Middle-Classes despite her Faithful inteNtions as regarded these Men makes a Lot of Sense to her and the Woman names this Process inVoluntary Mate-'Shunting' and pins it to 'Sx-eNergetic Levels' that determine One's Socioeconomic Strata for Life and Love - ie: the Middle-Class-born Girl wanted to be with the Boys who were around her because she wanted to be a Faithful Wife, but the Young Woman's Sx-eNergetic Levels were suited ( no Matter her Youthful Hopes for Marriage to whatever Boy was around, not to mention her Anarkist Politiks, which view Money as Suspect - a Successful Media Company isn't about Money, it's about Notoriety ) to Sx-Work for the Predominantly-Male 1% which is Only as interested in her Media Company as it is interested in her Sx-eNergetic Levels. This Woman has undergone a Shunting Process, through Sx Work, into the Socioeconomic Strata that Best-suits her Sx eNergetic Levels, and to deflect the Likelihood she will be Forcibly-raped she offers ‘Consensual-Rape Therapy’, an Xclusive Service you have to pay a Lot for, if not in Money.

The Last Story - mine - is Relevant because it illustrates how-so ‘Monogamy is Kryptonite to Super-Woman’ or ‘Why there are no Female Company-Founder/CEOs at the Plutocratic Level’ and it’s not because Women don’t have the Killer inStinct ( although, maybe ) - it’s because no Man is going to invest Large Sums of Money in a Business run by a Female Founder/CEO who isn’t a Corporate Robot he can in Some Way diminish as a Woman or CEO, so that he won’t want to have Sx with her, unless he is having Sx with her, so, if you don’t want to have Sx with Numerous Male Peers, you don’t have what it takes to be a Successful Female Founder/CEO in 2014, Ladies. This Problem - there is no Money for a Woman’s Top-Tier Start-up unless that Woman is willing to put Sx on the Table as a Bargaining Chip - is Particularly Pertinent at the Plutocratic Strata because it is in that Strata we find Men with the Highest Masculine Sx eNergetic ( Will Power ) Levels - that is Men who not Only want to dominate the Business World they work in but want to dominate the Women in their Personal Lives. A Male CEO can’t dominate a Woman if she’s calling herSelf a CEO and demanding Professional Equality, unless - she is somehow a Lesser CEO on Account of being a Woman; she is Somehow a Lesser Woman on Account of being a CEO; or her being a CEO is directly tied to her willingness to let your Sxually-dominate her for the Title. because I am a Woman who wants to be a CEO who was Socioeconomically-shunted into the Much-More-Accessible-for-Pretty-Poor-Women Prostitute Supply - I’m going to go with the 3rd Option - I made it up on the Fly. Not Only are Plutocratic Males Most Likely to want to Sxually-dominate a High-born, Professionally-Successful, or eSpecially-Attractive Lower-Class-born Woman as a Wife, they are Most Likely to seek Prostitutes who are considered the Most Seductive, Widely-Talented and Fetishistically-Kinky so as to play with these High-eNd Prostitutes once they feel satisfied an eNviable Wife has been dominated and locked down. So it is at this Juncture a Female CEO/Prostitute is created by Natural Pecking Order of Demand=Supply. If the Demand xists among Plutocratic Males to test their Sxual Powers with a Prostitute who is Widely considered the Creme and Most Ferocious of Prostitutes - a Suitable Woman will be ‘shunted’ into the Position of ‘World’s Greatest Whore’ - given ‘Feminism’ has advanced to Such a Point a Woman of Class and Ambition would label herSelf as Such and feel Good about it. May I suggest for the Demand=Supply Role of World’s Most Dangerous and Covetable Prostitute the Shunted-into-Prostitution-by-BF’s-Rich-Rapist-Dad Canadian-Girl-who-likes-Weapons-and-Drugs wished she was a New-Media CEO and is Smart enough to know you want to be a CEO Courtesan to CEOs you don’t ask for Money in return for Sx you ask to be received as a CEO no Matter the Clothing you wear or how Many People see your Genitals. 

Here is anOther Xample of how Life is Different for Men than for Women and so it has taken a Long Time for Women to be treated on par with Men in the Big Business Community: a Male Head of a Media Company who has a Lot of Sx with a Lot of Different Women - this Man is a CEO insofaras his Sxual Activity does not disrupt his Work, Dov. A Female Head of a Media Company who has a Lot of Sx with a Lot of Different Men is a Prostitute at Work - she is Only gets to be a CEO too insofaras her output as a Media-Content-Producer consists of arguing why a Woman who has Sx with Many Men and produces Art about it under a DIY Media Label she founded herself ought to be considered a CEO by Some Guy who wants to put his Penis in her Face because he is a CEO and Only the Best can appreciate his Penis with her Face - I, the Attractive Woman, get to be a CEO too so Male CEOs can feel Better about themSelves for putting their Penises in my Face, how Charming - I'm the CEO - Bitch! A Woman who is Monogamous does not have the Sx eNergetic Levels Necessary to be a CEO of a Major Media Company, which is why Sheryl Sandberg works for Mark Zuckerberg while Andrea Coates could lead Mark Zuckerberg around on a Leash with a Riding Crop on TV and might just! If you’re the Kind of Woman has the Sx eNergetic Levels to be CEO of a Major Media Company you’re the Kind of Woman is going to get so Many Sxual Offers you have to treat your Sx Life like an Essential Component of your Media Brand or Pretty Much your Whole Media Brand. Therefore the First Female Founder/CEO is Meta, or, Super-Woman.
My Media Company makes Comic Books starring your Face. Please invest More than Money.

Shunting also causes Disruptions in the Psycho-Sxual Organization and Behaviorism of Cliques.  Take for Xample my Highly-Promiscuous Clique in Highschool, whose unUsual Peer-Organization and Sxual-Behaviorisms I think can be traced to the Shunting Process that occurred between me, who had Particularly High Sx-eNergetic Levels for a Teenager, and my Boyfriend’s Father, who harbored Barely-Legal Hooker Fantasies. In the Ideal Human Clique, every Member knows their Socioeconomic Position and has a Lover or Rotation of Lovers who inDividually or as Part of a Polyamorous Family meet their Sx eNergetic Levels. However, when One or Several Members, eSpecially Near the Top of the Clique Organizational Structure, is lacking for an inDividual Lover or Stable Rotation of Lovers to meet their Sx-eNergetic Needs, this causes Shunting Disruptions at Lower Levels of the Socioeconomic Ladder within that Clique.

an Xample of how Shunting Disruptions happen:

the Alpha-Male of my Teenage Clique was my Upper-Middle-Class Teenage Boyfriend, a Boy who, let’s imagine, started out with Reasonably Normal Psychosxual Pursuasions - he had a Regular Girlfriend ( me ) but was Curious about Other Girls and wanted to swing a Bit. However, my Sx eNergetic Levels, as a submissive Alpha-Woman, were Higher than my Dominant Boyfriend’s, causing me to get shunted to the Boy’s Father, who had Much-Younger Hooker-Mistress Sx Fantasies he was not living out due to a Lack of Such Hookers in our Small Town. UnConscious Fears of the Reverse-Oedipal Rape that would occur if the Teenage Girl with unUsually High Sx-eNergetic Levels ( me ) came into Contact with the Domineering Father who wanted a Much-Younger Casual Mistress, plagued the Boy - “what if I bring my Girlfriend to meet my Family and my Dad steals her?” - so, instead of facing the Trauma of having his Dad take his Girlfriend for a Mistress because he as a Boy couldn’t quite match her, the Boy dumped the Girl. Clique Alpha Boy dumping Clique Alpha Girl so he wouldn't have to introduce her to his Rapey Father caused both of them to shunt downwards, resulting in Disruptions among those at Lower Levels of their Clique's Sx-eNergetic Hierarchy. Alpha Boy, having decided not to date Alpha Girl who was Best-suited to him out of Fear his Alpha Father would take her from him, turned his Attention to Girls who were not Sxual enough to handle him and he floundered Romantically as Well as setting a Poor Xample as Alpha Boy to the Other Boys in his Clique by appearing to disrespect the Alpha Girl his Friends knew he was in Love with. The Girl, who was too Sxual even for her Teenage Alpha Boyfriend to handle, developed Compensational Nymphomania: to meet her Sxual Needs with Lower-Level Males she had to have Sx with Many of them - she could not be trusted to respect Other People’s Relationships or her Own ( none of the Young Men she found to ‘date’ in lieu of the Alpha Boy were sufficient to satisfy her ) and was Compulsively Promiscuous, which further enforced the Notion, among the Clique, that she was not to be respected, as Well as cementing her in a ‘Prostitute/Mistress’ Sxual-Persona rather than a ‘Wife’ Sxual-Persona - what the Alpha Boy’s Alpha Father had wanted - not anOther Wife in Town but the Socioecomonomically-Necessary High-eNd Prostitute the Town lacked to meet his Sx-eNergetic Needs as an Alpha Male. So my Perception that Things among my Former Clique can Only be set Right - Friendships and Psycho-Sxual Balance restored - if I become the Father’s Mistress as Well as the Son’s Mistress and call mySelf a Professional Sx-Worker. That Arrangement would end the Father’s Sxual-Dissatisfaction by providing him with the Much Younger Mistress he should have had, end the Son’s Sxual-Dissatisfaction by providing him with the Swinger Alpha Girlfriend he should have had, and end the Girl’s Sxual Dissatisfaction by providing her with a Sufficient Number of Alpha Males to meet her elevated Sx eNergetic Levels. but of Course my Sx eNergetic Levels are even Higher than that and I Summarily get farmed out to even Higher-Level Alpha-Males so that my Upper-Middle-Class Pimps ( who use Complx, Abusive, Ritualistic Mind-Control Practices on me to keep me Loyal to them ) can piggy-back on the shunting Process up the Socioeconomic Ladder to the Plutocracy along with me, which is on the Domestic Level like the interNational Phenomenon of Men who sell their Women to Richer Men in Other Countries to make enough Money to be so Rich in their Poorer Country - my XBF and his Dad could make More Money and accrue More Social Credit Faster pimping my Plutocratic Sx-eNergy to Billionaires than working at Upper-Middle-Class Jobs for Plutocrats and hoping to be noticed and elevated Socially and Financially for their aSxual Work-Ethic alone. A Man who is willing to pimp his Particularly Slutty Girlfriend for Access to the Plutocracy is showing More Masculine Will Power than a Man who hopes doing a Good Job at his Upper-Middle-Class Job will grant him Access to the Plutocracy. So the Dad quits his Dignified Civil Servant Job to become a Mind-Control Cult-Leader Pimp who, along with his Son, provides High-eNd Prostitutes to Equally-eLevated Men. Could Retirement get Any Sxier? Probably not, no. You could call it - Professional Shunting.

That is the Basics of how 'shunting' works, and I hope now a Small Part of how the World turns and why makes More Sense to Some People, and the Term enters Popular Lexicon.


A Do-Good Patriarch - recognizing the Subtle Distinction between Responsible Sxual Mentorship and condescending to Women

This Guy - Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at henry@henrymakow.com - down the Illuminati Conspiracy Rabbit Hole I found. I’m going to call him a Do-Good Patriarch, and I want to cut him a New One with my Clever Feminist Brain. Do-Good, because like Any Number of Mansplainers I think he’s Well-inTentioned with his Advice he’s giving Young-Men-Against-interNational-Brainwashing-Rapists, but, uh, he Really misunderstands Feminism and the Difference between being an Old-Fashioned Old Man whose Sx Drive has mellowed and Sage Counsel to Youth indoctrinated in Misogynistic Sx-Hyped Media. Let’s see if I can illuminate Feministy Things for him.

Politically Incorrect Advice for Young Men

My life was dysfunctional until the age of 50 because I naively accepted the feminist assumptions purveyed by the mass media.

Yet I continue to Naively assume Feminism is what I see of it in the Mass Media.

Feminism. The Worst Thing to hit Women since Men.

I never imagined the financial elite is engaged in a war to destabilize society by trashing heterosexual roles. This hateful government attack on the traditional family continues unabated today. The purpose is to create a totalitarian New World Order where people are isolated and mind control replaces jackboot.
Like millions of men, I was let "off the hook" by sexual liberation and feminism. Instead of becoming a husband and father, I was free to have sex and search for my "identity."

Having Casual Sx while you seek your Identity is Adolescent. But what if - you found your Identity - as a Prostitute????????????? because of All the Casual Sx you couldn't stop having?????????????

Often sex and identity were confused. I didn't understand that men mature and find direction and purpose by assuming the responsibility of marriage and family. As a result, I suffered from arrested emotional development and missed my opportunity to have a family.

This is All Well and Fine, Right? Mass Media does distort Feminism into ‘I’m Free to be SxE so

Flesh Parade, and I’m willing to allow a Perversion of Sincere attempts to liberate Women from Patriarchal Oppression has been perpetrated by Satanists who want to destabilize the Family so to enslave us - however

What follows is an antidote to elite feminist propaganda. I don't want young men to fall into the same trap.

1. The creation of a strong and loving family is perhaps the highest goal to which a man can aspire. This is the natural process by which men (and women) grow over a lifetime. This is how we find love and intimacy. It isn't for everyone but it is the path to happiness for most.


2. Stop listening to the media, your peer group or parents. "Trust thy self," Emerson says in Self Reliance (1841) "Whoso would be a man, must be a nonconformist." What are your instincts telling you? For example, I always knew I wanted to rule my own roost but feminism prohibited this. Obey your instincts.

Feminism prohibited you from ruling your Roost? How did it do that? By suggesting not All Women want a Man who ‘rules’ the ‘Roost’? Guess what - not All Women want to a Man to rule the Roost. My iNstincts tell me if I lived in a ‘Roost’ where a Man ‘ruled’ I would commit Suicide. So, I'm going to live between Many Men, None of whom ‘rules’ Any ‘Roost’ - Certainly not where you'll find me, like, I'll leave as Soon as I sense Any Roost Ruling going on - but All of whom are Powerful Men.

3. Make work (not women) your passion. Work is the backbone of a man. Men gain self-confidence from performing a task well, and receiving reward and recognition. Women will try to come between a man and his work but don't let them. Don't let anyone or anything thwart your gift. Women do not respect men who make them their first priority. Your work will keep you on course and help you avoid temptation.

Have I told you about my Boyfriend’s Dad? He is a Workaholic buried his Passionate Loin Desires for a Hooker Mistress in his impOrtant Job and in his Legitimate Son who as a Teenager Fortunately Never saw his Dad cheat on his Mom with a Hooker Mistress, but Never saw his Dad either, and for Some Reason Only had Sx with Women who behaved like Hooker Mistresses towards him. My Boyfriend’s Dad did Such a Good Job at his Job and not breaking up his Family over Passionate Loin Desires for a Hooker Mistress, bringing in that Money, what a Suitable Provider, the Universe mailed a Hooker Mistress Application Right to his Work as Reward and Recognition for his Years of Service to Manly Dignity. However, the Hooker Mistress is asking him to quit his Job so as to have her. Oooooh Temptation. Which is the Ethical Thing to do here? Keep your Job and your Monogamy and quite Possibly give yourSelf Prostate Cancer again? Or quit your Job to hang out with the Feminist Philosopher taught herSelf how to treat Prostate Cancer through Sx Majik? Hmmmm Temptation.

4. Our society makes sex, love and female beauty into a phony religion in order to distract and manipulate us. Sex and beauty soon become tedious. The magic ends. Real love develops over a long period of time and is based on trust and caring.

Sx and Beauty become Tedious? Since when? You got Old and Married Good? Sure, a Relationship based on Sx and Beauty alOne will Soon become Tedious, but so would a Marriage without Sx and Beauty. However, what do I know - I’m not Old or Married Good.

5. Do not put beautiful women on a pedestal. They are flawed like everyone else. They are more trouble because of their sense of entitlement. Do not marry someone based on sexual infatuation. I recount this error in my book "A Long Way to go for a Date." Never show weakness. In courtship, don't appear eager. Women interpret this as weakness. Keep your dignity. Nothing earns her respect quicker than rejection. Men think they will be loved for their sterling qualities. This is not so. Women are looking for men who make them feel secure. They want men who exude confidence. If you're insecure, remember there are many woman more insecure than you.

Never show Weakness. You know what my Teenage Boyfriend Never showed me, or did his Best not to show me? His Weaknesses. You know what I call G? An Abusive Sociopath. Would be Nice if he showed More Weaknesses. I don’t respect my Teenage Boyfriend because he Constantly rejected me in Order to persuade me I was no More than a Hooker Mistress to him - I am Deeply hurt by his Repeated Rejections of me, that’s why I’m going to take his Dad and his Dad’s Job - I respect my Teenage Boyfriend because he Eventually, in my Mind, coughs up to being an Abusive Sociopath who needs to learn to show More Vulnerability if he’s going to avoid going to Jail or overdosing on Cocaine or getting Shot in a Drug Deal gone Wrong or Other Things that happen to Abusive Sociopathic Men who think showing Weaknesses makes them Weak Men and unAttractive to Women. Does the Man I’m Most in Love with - the Abusive Sociopath who took my Virginity and treated me like a Hooker Mistress to the Point I became One - make me feel Secure? No. He’s a Gangster - he makes me feel like if I don’t learn how to kill People, I will get killed. What makes me feel Secure is Feminist Self-eMpowerment - Yes I can! - learn how to be as Good or Better a Gangster than my Abusive Boyfriend I’m still attached to because of Trauma-based Mind-Control or because there’s SomeThing in him worth loving or a little of Both. Then he’ll respect me even though I’m inCapable of Rejecting him and always too Eager around him with my hoping we’ll be in a ‘Real Relationship’ One Day.

6. Now that I have emerged from the hormonal haze at age 55, I can see that sex is a fraud and really a minor part of life. Sexual frustration is used to distract and sell us. People wouldn't be frustrated if they got married at a young age as they did in the 1950's and started families. Women should marry and have kids before going to university; men after beginning their careers.

How about - no. How about - I’m a Feminist Hooker and Sx is my Livelihood and I use it to sell eNvironmental Sustainability and Regional Sovereignty. You have no Right to tell People when they should or shouldn’t get Married or have Children. That is for People to decide on their Own, based on what works for them. Things weren't Super Duper before the 50s when eVeryOne got married Young - Women were oppressed, Prostitution flourished, contracting Syphilis was considered Fashionable among the Upper Classes, etc - Sure Sxual Frustration is used to distract and sell us, but dismissing the Value of Sx to Life is condescending to and oppressing of Women like me who are Highly Sxual by Nature and Nurture. I’m not ashAmed of making Sxual Appeal an inTegral Part of my Life and Livelihood, I’m hurt by a Society still insists Women like me are selling ourSelves Short by offering ourSelves Sxually. People dismiss me as a Writer because they think a "Real Writer" wouldn't put Nude Photographs of herSelf on her Blog or try to get her I-think-VICE-is-Misogynistic-and-ought-to-apologize Campaign through at VICE Media by trying to fuck the CEO.

7. Society is addicted to sex. The atmosphere is sexualized. Human relationships have been degraded. The best way to fight sex addiction is to get married. Sexual liberation is not wanting sex (because you have it.) I am now happily married and find outside temptation intrusive. Call it male menopause but I switch the channel.

Our Society is addicted to Sx and yes Relationships have been degraded. But the Best Way to fight Sx Addiction is to get Married? To whom? If you’re a Nympho Hooker like me? My Nice Feminist Boyfriend who respects me? I’ve been with him for 4 Years, we have Child, and yet I spend Half my Time on the interNet writing about how I intend to fuck Cruel Dictators for Policy Presents. My Pimp? If I married him, his Dad wouldn’t be able to fuck me and feel Okay about himSelf, that’s why my BF from Adolescence I would marry, even though he’s an Abusive Sociopath ( because I'm Loyal ), gets to be my Pimp instead of my Husband.  My Boyfriend’s Dad? Ew. The Closest he gets to marrying me is giving me a Fancy Ring I throw in the Ocean. The VICE CEO I think I marry? I don’t think I marry that Guy because it’ll end my Sx Addiction - I think I marry that Guy because his being the CEO of VICE depends on him being married to a Nympho Prostitute Assassin who is always running off on him Hilariously. But you know what? I have Relationships to All these People, even if I’m not Traditionally ‘married’ to Any of them. My Sx Addiction, whether it was produced by the Media or by my Sociopathic Pimp Boyfriend and his Leering Dad or my Hormones or All of the Above cannot be contained to a Traditional Marriage, would poison me in a Traditional Marriage, and when Do-Good Patriarch talks about Monogamous Heterosxual Marriage being the Cure for Sx Addiction he is oversimplifying the Human Sx Drive and Human Relationships.

8. Do not marry a woman who doesn't make you and her family her first priority. Do you want to share your wife with her boss? If you have an aim in life, why would you marry someone who doesn't support it? Or has a competing agenda? In the marketplace of love, men have the power. Our fertility lasts three times as long as theirs. We are the buyers. There are plenty of fine women, especially if we look abroad.

In the Market Place of Love, Men have the Power because their Fertility lasts Three Times Longer. There are Plenty of Fine Women, eSpecially if we look Abroad. Like where - Thailand? That Kind of Hugely inSulting Condescension passed off as Manly Wisdom is why Feminism xists as an Academic Field populated by Bitches with Reactionary Body Hair. Feminism the Philosophy xists so I, the Young Woman Prostitute, have the Guts to tell you, the Old Man with the PhD, that you are Full of Shit and should shut up about Men having the Power in Mate Selection because their Fertility lasts 3X Longer. Also, you know what helps me cope with the Tribulations of Motherhood? My Career. You know what would happen to me if Some Man told me to make my Family my First Priority, so stop with All the Writing about Promiscuity on the interNet, Andrea -? I would get Severely depressed and my Child would suffer. I’m not a Good Mother and Partner to my Men because I put my Family First, I’m a Good Mother and Partner to my Men because I balance their Needs with my Own, and I also call the Instinctual Awareness that Sometimes I have to meet my inDividual Needs or I wont be able to meet my Family’s Needs - Feminist Philosophy. Go fuck yourSelf with your Fertility in Thailand.

9. Real women are self-effacing. They put their husbands and their children before themselves. This is how women show love: by self-surrender. Avoid women who compete, control, criticize or complain (the 4 c's). Avoid women who are overachievers. Don't get hung up on unavailable women. They're aren't as special as they wish you to think. Choose a wife who complements you and is a good companion. Choose one who will be a good mother.

More with the Real Women sublimate themselves to a Man Hackneyed Bullshit. Am I somehow not a Real Woman to you because I have an Ego and think if I put my Men before mySelf they would become Greedy Dictators like we see All over the World in Patriarchal Countries where Feminism is a Dirty Word and Whores are to be relegated to the Shadows and can’t be Good Mothers and overAcheiving Women are so not SxE and not Good Mothers either? You know why I’m the World’s Greatest Whore, Dude? Because I’m the Multi-Talented overAchieving Woman with the Balls to challenge Dictators. Men who live in Isolated Power Towers need to be challenged by Feminist Women or they become Mass Murderers, and I’m not even kidding. Sure Women show Love through Self-Surrender. But they also show Love by calling your Bullshit what it is - Bullshit.  

10. Being possessive is natural. A man wants to possess a woman. Women want to be possessed. In the act of love, we say a man "possesses" a woman. Total love equals total possession. This is not the same as domination. It is a partnership based on mutual trust and respect. My wife does not share my political views on many subjects.

Possession does not equal Domination. I like that. You know what I don’t like tho? The Men in my Boyfriend’s Patriarchal Family getting so Possessive of Pretty little me they have Sx with me One after the Other in a Hotel in California in a Vision I had and I pass out and dissociate because that’s a Lot of being possessed for a Girl, even me ( I like to think it happens because I'm Special ), which is why I have to know it is going to happen, to brace mySelf in the Past to live through it in the Future, but the Men being too Cowardly in the Present to admit the Studly Sons aren’t married yet and the Father hasn’t gotten himSelf anOther Mistress because of how Densely wrapped up in possessing me they All are. Total Love = Total Possession - even across Siblings, Generations, and Time! The Only Things makes it worth it to me is I get to impress upon them my Political Views on Many Subjects.

11. Think of your seed as your unique spirit and essence. Would you entrust it to a vulgar or mediocre woman just because she is attractive? Ideally we would only have sex with a woman we would want to mother our children. This is why sex was reserved for marriage.

Feminist Opinion, and the Past suggests: Sx was reserved for Marriage because Men are Possessive, Greedy, Jealous and Domineering with their Penises and Verbally or Boot-stomp Women who try to tell them so about the History of Marriage. I still like Men, but Probably because I don’t have to have Sx with Only One of them. I think having to share me wtih Others keeps their Possessive Greedy Jealous Domineering Sides in balance, makes them More Liable to share Other Forms of Wealth the Mass Media is teaching us to hoard.

12. The media is doing a number on us regarding children. How often do we see children portrayed in a truly positive light? As the angels they often are? We are rich in proportion to the things we love. The highest love is between husband and wife, and parents and children.


13. Don't waste your time "looking for God." We find God by serving Him, and obeying Him. God speaks through our sense of right and wrong, and ideals of absolute truth, justice and love. We are not men if we refuse to sacrifice our "selves" to God ( i.e. obey) . Truth is liberating even if the truth is about our present bondage.

Obey God? What does God want? What’s in the Bible? What if Some of what’s in the Bible rubs me the Wrong Way, as a Woman Particularly? Surely then it is apprOpriate to go searching for God elsewhere. See, despite agreeing with Many of its Values, like I agree with Many of your Values Sir, I find the Bible to be too Patriarchal - Him and His Virgin and His Son - so, I  practice Feminist Earth Majik, which can also be called ‘Ethical Satanism’. And yes I find it liberating to know I am trapped in Emotional Bondage to my Abusive Pimp BF and his Domineering Rapist Dad, but I am trapped in Emotional Bondage to an Abusive Pimp BF and his Domineering Rapist Dad, and SomeTimes the God in the Bible is too Much like them for me to want to obey Him as Well.

Much of this was common knowledge when I was a child in the 1950's. Over the years the elite has gradually undermined our understanding of the natural order. It is still doing so by promoting homosexuality which includes lesbianism in the guise of feminism.

I'm Sorry but are you harshing on the Feminist Lesbians cause you don’t understand why they don't have Sx with Men?

An establishment that sows fear and confusion between the sexes, and promotes promiscuity and family breakdown does not have the country's best interest at heart.


Many of our feminist political, cultural and economic "leaders" are moral whores, dupes traitors and often worse. We resist them by building strong healthy families and giving our children wholesome values.

Moral Whores represent!

So, what has our Do-Good Patriarch - Hopefully - learned?

1. There’s Feminism as it appears in the Media ( “Girl Power is being Slutty!” “Feminists want to destroy the Family and usurp Men’s Positions as Roost Rulers!” ) and then there’s Feminist Theory. Some Feminist Philosophers are Man-bashers think Porn is degrading to Women. Some Feminist Philosophers want Women to be empowered and Free within their Relationships to Men, whatever these Relationships might look like, and feel that in Order for it to be so, Men need to be challenged on their Possessive Patriarchal Privilege. This Feminist Philosopher thinks Men are Both Wonderful and Deplorable and Some Porn is degrading while Other Porn can empower Women and challenge Possessive Patriarchal Privilege.

2. There’s being concerned Media is training Young People to seek Sx over Relationships and then there’s confusing your Libio-Levels and Man-Dom/Woman-sub HeteroNormative Sxual preJudices with Monoagmous Heterosxual Man-Dom/Woman-sub Marriage being the One and Only Spiritually-Moral and Biologically-Sound Relationship Dynamic.

3. There’s teaching Women they have Value beyond their Sxual Services and then there’s condescending to and marginalizing Women for behaving in a Sxual Manner.

4. There’s understanding that Feminine Sxuality is about Surrender and then there’s xpecting a Woman surrender in eVery Aspect of her Life with a Man and their Family.

5. There’s valuing the Family and a Nearness to God as the Highest Aims to which a Person can aspire and then there’s using ‘Family’ and ‘God’ to trap Women in oppressive Social and Relationship Dynamics.

6. There’s understanding that Casual Sx can be Emotionally and Physically-traumatizing and then there’s condescending to and marginalizing Sx Workers for servicing a Social Need for Casual Sx.

7. There’s wanting a Woman not to challenge you or criticize or complain or control and then there’s Situations where if a Woman doesn’t do One of the 4Cs or All of them, Shit is going to go downHill for you Both.

8. There’s thinking - Deep down, All Good Men want to support a Family - and then then there’s realizing Some Men, even if Good Deep down, can’t be attracted to a Wife unless that Wife behaves like a Prostitute and these Men make Talented Pimps but Lousy Husbands.

9. There’s understanding a Masculine Man wants to possess a Feminine Woman, but that Possession does not Necessarily mean Domination, and then there’s understanding that this Desire to possess Women is what led to a Culture of Women being treated like Chattel.

10. There’s understanding that a Man is his Job, and that if he gives up his Mission up for a Woman she will not respect him, and then there’s understanding that if you turn down a Woman you love because it will cost you a Job you are a Weak Man.

11. There’s understanding that the Relationships which confer the Most Respect unto a Person are those that last until Death do you part, and then there’s xpecting People to conform to a Monogamous-Marriage Moral Paradigm that is Ultimately Subjective.

12. There’s wanting to teach your Children how to be in Respectful Sxual Relationships and then there’s imagining that People whose Sxual Realtionship Dynamics are not ‘Wholesome’ - like mine to my Pimp I love for Xample, or my Imaginary CEO Husband I dont want to live with - are inSuitable Parents because they can’t perform  Monogamous HeteroNormative Marriage.

13. There’s learning to see Women as More than Sx Objects and then there’s learning to see Women who are Sx Objects as Human.

14. There's recognizing that Masculinity and its Attendants - Violence, Possessiveness - have Value even in a Feminist Culture and then there's failing to recognize that Masculinity and its Attendants Violence and Possessiveness whether enacted by Man or Woman are the Cause of Most Humankind's Afflictions and require Feminist eMpathic Sx Majik so as not to ravage the Earth and enslave its People.

15. There's valuing Masculinity for Good Reason and then there's dissing Feminism for Bad Reason.


Feminism. Helping People with eMpathy since the Beginning of Time.